Yes, sanctions are government to government and also do not cover all facets of life in any case.
I had trouble sleeping last night so I spent the time reading about this. The information about sanctions is very extensive, covering hundreds if not thousands of pages.
I see the problem. I found this info:
"All foreign financial institutions, including private and state-owned institutions, remain subject to section 104(c) of the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act (CISADA), which calls for sanctions on foreign financial institutions that are found to have knowingly engaged in facilitating significant transactions for specific Iranian-linked individuals and entities. [02-14-2012]"
“Foreign financial institution” is defined in section 1245 of the NDAA with reference to section 104(i) of CISADA (22 U.S.C. § 8513(i)). As further defined in the IFSR, a “foreign financial institution” is “any foreign entity that is engaged in the business of accepting deposits, making, granting, transferring, holding, or brokering loans or credits, or purchasing or selling foreign exchange, securities, commodity futures or options, or procuring purchasers and sellers thereof, as principal or agent. It includes but is not limited to depository institutions, banks, savings banks, money service businesses, trust companies, securities brokers and dealers, commodity futures and options brokers and dealers, forward contract and foreign exchange merchants, securities and commodities exchanges, clearing corporations, investment companies, employee benefit plans, and holding companies, affiliates, or subsidiaries of any of the foregoing.” 31 C.F.R. § 561.308. It does not include “the international financial institutions identified in 22 U.S.C. 262r(c)(2), the International Fund for Agricultural Development, or the North American Development Bank.” 31 C.F.R. § 561.308. Treasury anticipates closely modeling the definition of this term under the NDAA on the IFSR.
There are 700 specific Iranians on the sanctions list and we will say you are not one of them. The problem is that a local bank 1) doesnt know who you are and if you have been sanctioned 2) doesnt know that money you are transacting in is helping the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. or helping terrorists located anywhere.
A further problem is that anyone helping an Iranian in a sanctioned transaction is also guilty of a crime. So a bank wont go near you in fear of being a party to the wrong kind of help.
That said, and connected to that, The US Treasury Dept has (or is) going to extraordinary lengths to help Iranian citizens in general by first forcing open extensive internet access and allowing citizens to apply for waivers, for example transacting in medicine, money, supplies to help family members in Iran.
Sanctions ARE governmental in the sense the US is trying to avoid conflict between Iran and Israel and to do that, there are unfortunate consequences that branch out like an octopus in all directions, money transactions being within the core and sweeping up everyone in the process.
Thats my morning digest of the situation and I have not found anything helpful to your cause. There have been sanctions before and lets hope at least some aspects of it pass soon because regular life must continue too.
That and the workpass situation dont allow me to give you any good advice here but bear in mind my knowledge of this is extremely thin. I'll see if I can find anything else that could be called good news.