New ID and its link to the yellow health card

rooikat wrote:

Advice please   My husband and I are retired, have submitted our S1 forms to the UK and in turn have received our Certificates of Entitlement issued by the Ministry for Health in Malta. These certificates have our passport numbers on them because we don't have an identity number (we sent our E residence application by post 6 weeks ago) In order to visit clinic and the hospitals, Mater Dei has issued us with a number with an F at the end. The problem now is that the medicine Entitlement Unit at St Luke's hospital will not accept the forms that the consultant at the clinic has filled in to apply our yellow cards for chronic medicines. I phoned them today for an appointment (apparently you don't need one) but was told emphatically 'no ID to put in the system means we don't take your application' No matter how hard I tried to explain why we don't have an ID number or temporary one I got the same answer, no we won't process your application. I explained that Mater DEI and the Clinics are using the number with an F at the end, but they say they have to have an ID number We have nearly exhausted our 4 months supply of medicines from the UK and it looks like we could be paying for further chronic medications for months! Can we approach the British Embassy regarding this, as our right as British Citizens (or is it as EU Citizens) to have full health entitlement which includes medicines. Is there a 'customer care' email address that we can use to contact the Ministry for Home Affairs and National Security to explain the situation and chase up a temporary ID number. I  have noticed a few expats have mentioned this customer care dept but I can't find it on their website.

Dear rooikat,

1) Given that Malta has broken EU law in your regard, copy, paste and submit your post to: the European Parliament Committee on Petitions online in any of the official languages of the European Union.

Simply click on this internet link to do so:

https://www.secure.europarl.europa.eu/a … ition.html


2) Please note that under EU law, an ‘e-Residence Card’ / New identity card may under no circumstances be made a precondition for the exercise of a right or the completion of an administrative formality, because entitlement to rights may be attested by any other means of proof.

See page 36: Article 25 - Section 1: General provisions concerning residence documents

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/Lex … 123:en:PDF


In precisely the same vein, the reason underpinning the decision of the European Commission to launch infringement proceedings against Malta for the incorrect application of the free movement Directive regarding the discriminatory two-tier water and electricity consumption tariff policy is as follows:

‘….To benefit from reduced water and electricity tariffs, EU citizens residing in Malta need to submit specific residence documents – other means for proving their residence are not accepted by the MT authorities. By contrast, Maltese citizens need only to submit a copy of their identity card (and no proof of residence)………….’

ricky wrote:

Hi Oisin,

to be honest, most of us know these things!

But how long will it take to enforce these issues with Malta?

Do you have any timeline and whether affected EU citizens can claim for damages?

I don't think signing the petition will help rooikat with his problem , as much as Arriva is still charging higher rates and ARMS still charge different rates although they were challenged by the EU.

I do agree that we should sign the petition but I don't see any reaction from the EU that would help involved EU citizens.

Cheers
Ricky

Dear Ricky,

QED - as follows:

The Times of Malta, Friday, 27th June, 2008.

Departure tax removal 'a victory for citizens' rights'

Nationalist MEP Simon Busuttil yesterday described the recent announcement of the removal of the departure tax as a victory for Maltese citizens' rights in the EU.

Addressing the Petitions Committee of the European Parliament, which was discussing five separate petitions against this tax, Dr Busutil welcomed the government's decision to completely abolish the tax.

"At a time of disillusionment with Europe, particularly following the rejection of the Lisbon Treaty in Ireland, here is one concrete example that the EU works for citizens. This is a victory for citizens' rights," Dr Busuttil told the committee.
Dr Busuttil praised the five complainants for standing up for their EU rights and also thanked the Commission for its involvement in this case.

The petitions in front of the EP committee were received from two Maltese citizens, Anna Ignacak Mifsud and Matthew Buttigieg, the Federated Association of Travel and Tourism Agents (Fatta), Robert Coenen, a Dutch citizen and Oisin Jones-Dillon from Ireland.

They all asked the Petitions Committee to intervene and exert pressure on the Maltese authorities to remove this tax.

Asked for his reaction, a representative of the European Commission told the committee that earlier this month the Commission had decided to take this case to the European Court of Justice.

However, it subsequently received a letter from Maltese Foreign Minister Tonio Borg, addressed to Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, which announced that the Maltese authorities intended to remove the tax completely with effect from November 1 and to publish the relevant legal notice by the end of this month. He said that a copy of the regulations has already been sent to the Commission.

The Commission representative said that the Commission will now wait to see whether the removal will indeed take place as announced.

Intervening during the debate, Dr Busuttil pointed out that two of the five complainants referred not just to the departure tax charged on flights but also to the departure tax levied on passengers who use maritime transport, such as the catamaran to Sicily.

He asked the Commission to declare whether it felt that this tax too was incompatible with EU law in the same way as the departure tax charged on flights.

The committee agreed to leave the petitions open pending a reply from the Commission on this point.

Source: http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/vi … hts.214314
.

toonarmy9752 wrote:

yes but this was 5 years ago - how many moves forward here have the EU made in say the last two years????? not many if any at all.

Several, toonarmy9752.

But they've never been advertised nor are they ever likely to be.

ricky wrote:

Hi Oisin,

we can discuss politics and lobbying as much as we want but I think rooikat was looking for a faster solution to their problem.

You have been on the island for longer than I have and have more contacts than I have. Is there anything we can do to solve their accute problem of access to essential medicine?

Cheers
Ricky

Apart from the contact details you have already provided, nothing springs to mind, Ricky.

However, even if the Ministry for Home Affairs and National Security feigns indifference, it is certain to be sensitive to the fact that rooikat is aware of his EU rights.

tearnet wrote:

Go private, it's not expensive and you get what you need quickly.
Not the answer byron would agree with but we have to live in the real world and harping on about what we should be entitled too is not helping rooikat.

Terry ( on holiday in Sicily).

Rest assured, Terry.

I only operate in the real world.

redmik wrote:

Since when has politics reflected real situations in the real world? We love the islands and the people but they do regard the Ex Pat and the tourist as 'cash cows'. Until something impacts upon the island's powers that be, very little will change. By that I mean they need to be hit where it hurts; in the collective pocket. Show me a politician who is going to do that.

well said Red

rooikiat needs prompt action and no amount of political statements will address their immediate problem.

Until the EU find their teeth and use them Malta will continue to see EU nationals as cash cows of the first order.

Not withstanding this we still find the good here outweighs the frustratingly bad things.

toonarmy9752 wrote:

it is indeed a disgrace that its taking the authorities so damned long to even issue a residency permit - 6 months is more than enough to get things together and start working effectively and to get them issued promptly - why is it actually taking so long to produce a simple certificate. I could understand the problem with the non EU with the biometric data side of things taking longer but this is just ridiculous and too much red tape for what it really is.  Please dont just say " well this is Malta" its wearing a bit thin now and is truly unacceptable.

Well this is Malta!
(I hade to do it)

Terry (happy camper)

toonarmy9752 wrote:

M = Malta
G = Gozo
L = Local as in maltese citizenship gained
H = ?
A = Alien as in us (all foreigners)
P = ? might be Permanent residency
F = ?

As I thought so why not just use the suffix A?

There must be some 'out there' with similar tales to tell or is this one unique?