@RockyM Hi, I'm a bit confused about what you had mentioned regarding your spinal surgery. I've been suffering from lower back pain and sciatica for several years. I have done research over the years from people who had spinal surgeries just to see if the surgeries helped them get rid of the debilitating pain associated with their bulging discs / herniated disks.
The results post surgery vary according to the testimonials I've came across. I have come to understand each case is unique as there each individual has variable factors that come into play. There overall health, if they are obese, lifestlye, the surgeons experience and level of expertise, etc...
I've watched so many testimonials regarding lower back surgeries via youtube and the post-op comments recorded on the YouTube videos is truly incredible as some have had successful post-op results while others had absolutely no improvements in regards to getting rid of the nerve pains.
Now I also understand there are different methods to treat bulging discs / herniated discs as the youtube video testimonials show.
In your comments you I see you mention the surgeon implanted two discs in your spine. Then you also mention the surgeon also place screws and pins in your spine.
Here is where my confusion is. I'll explain. When artificial discs are implanted, the surgeon makes the inscicion in the abdomen if the herniated discs are in the lumbar spine.
Another method is called a spinal fusion where the surgeon makes the inscicion in the patients lower back if the herniated discs are in the lumbar spine. The surgeon nips away removing the bulging / herniated discs to relieve pressure off of the compressed nerve roots that are causing all the pain then the surgeon proceeds with implanting bone graph inside a small cage that is implanted in the middle in between the vertebra of the lumbar spine where the bulging / herniated disc was located. Usually the most common area for herniated discs is in the L4-L5 level of the lumbar spine. Also the L5-S1 level of the lumbarsacral spine. Then the surgeon implants the pins and screws to stabilize the lumbar spine while the bone graph inside the cage begins the fusion process of the two vertebra and that takes its time for the bone graph to grow and complete the fusion.
So, did you have artificial discs implanted where your inciscion was made in your lower abdomen where the artificial discs are anchored in between the vertebra or did you have a spinal fusion where the inscion was made on your lower back and the need for pins and screws implanted to stabilze the spine while the fushion takes it's course?
I'm asking you this question because like I mentioned, the post-op testimonials I've seen are all across the board, with both negative and positive results and so I'm looking to see which is a better option between having artificial discs implanted or spinal fusion.
I've seen both cases where the implanted articicial discs slip out of position and the patient needs revision surgery. Also patients with positive results with artificial discs.
On the flip side, I've seen patients do ok after spinal fusion and patients who would need revision surgery because the spinal fusion has caused the ajacent healthy discs to carry extra load and those discs which were healthy are now bulging /herniated and the patient need further surgeries to relieve the nerve pain caused by new herniated discs.
The fusion option makes me sceptical as the spine is design is to be flexible and not rigid and still which is what a spinal fusion creates, complicating things further down line as the adjacent dics below and above the fusion are now responsible to carry more weight beyond than they are designed capable of. This is where problems are created making matters worse.
As for artificial discs are concerned, I have come to believe the level of success or failure lies in the expertise of the surgeon making the implant. If the surgeon is not highly skilled with implanting the artificial discs correctly in between the vertebra the patient will probably suffer down the line as the artificial disc may slip out of position and the need for revision surgery may be necessary.
The flip side to articial discs vs spinal fusion is that the articial discs will mimic the function of a heathly disc and the adjacent healthy discs will not be affected in contrast to a spinal fusion.
That is only my opinion after several years of researching on the side lines if you will of patient testimonials post-op results from both types spinal fusions and artificial discs implant surgeries of the lumbar spine.
👍1 member reacted to this post