I'm not a visa expert, but I thought perhaps we could have a conversation about the difference between getting a visa extension vs a brand new visa.
*As I understand it* (apologies if it's a ramble)
Recent restrictions on exiting and reentering Vietnam have caused many people to apply for a visa extension when they might normally be getting a new visa (sometimes called a "visa renewal").
Actually it seems, it is a visa "extension" which "renews" the same, exact visa.
A new visa is just that: a totally brand new document which requires exiting Vietnam and reentry, while an "extension" allows a person to remain in Vietnam.
(A third, illegal option is often used, but I won't discuss it in my post)
We've also been talking about the prices from agents, with some people accusing the agents of inflating visa prices.
I'm definitely sure there are some agents who do that.
But remember: ANY quotes we receive from an agency are for that agency only.
We simply can't use the fees from one agency to paint a picture of what all agents are doing.
Also, it's ALWAYS more expensive to EXTEND a Visa than it is to simply purchase a NEW visa.
Think about what's being done (as far as immigration and the agent are concerned) and it's easy to understand why that's so:
The agent sponsors your NEW visa with little risk.
However, after you have been living in Vietnam and the agent sponsors your visa RENEWAL, your actions while in Vietnam COULD come into question:
Have you been working illegally or been involved in "undesirable" activities?
And why the heck do you need to have more time being a genuine tourist, if that's all you are doing?
Also, an extension (which requires extra effort by the agent than does a new visa) has the added convenience of not requiring a border run (which would be impossible under current regulations) and so the agents are well aware that they are selling the convenience of not needing to spend the time and money a border run would require.
Also, the "changes" in fees are probably not published because:
---
1. In some cases they aren't "changes".
It's always been more expensive to get an in-country extension than it has been to purchase a new visa requiring a border run.
If you've always purchased a new visa and never purchased an actual extension, then the prices quoted for an extension might appear to be inflated.
2. Visa prices (new and extensions) have always varied because of different factors, including the nationality of the applicant.
---
The added factor now is that immigration (under these special circumstances) is offering a 30 day extension (from the date of expiration) IF the Embassy/Consulate of the applicant's home nation will "sponsor" the applicant.
It would be a mistake (it seems) for anyone to confuse this with an effort to promote tourism or make it easy to be a tourist for a longer period of time.
That $10 extension is clearly (to me) intended as a stopgap measure only.
Vietnam appears to want all tourists with expired/expiring visas (which also means the loss of sponsorship) to leave the country OR contact one of their approved agents who will agree to sponsor up to a three month extension.
It's a mistake to compare the stopgap measure of the Immigration department with the sponsorship of a visa agent for an extended period of time.
Yes, I know a lot of people just don't like it, but that's the system here.
You are definitely welcome to correct me without attacking me.