IGCSE versus GSCE

I have read on various occasions that the quality of IGCSE's are not comparable to (lower) than the UK GCSE. Here are some articles that may make you question that assumption. In fact IGCSEs are known to be much more rigorous than GCSE being more comparable to the old GCE O level.
Many schools in the UK are actually moving to the IGCSE and the IB in favour of the existing GCSE and A levels as their quality is dropping.

PS I am not a school teacher and have no personal interests other than educating myself on seperating fact from heresay.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article … evels.html

also

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/educ … 924496.stm  (note this is an old article and changes have been made to say speaking in French, etc)

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/08 … 27952.html

More recent article

The point that interested me in this debate is the fact that a wider range of languages can be taken. So I looked up a list of subjects that are examined under IGCSE.

http://www.cie.org.uk/programmes-and-qu … /subjects/

Like comparing chalk and cheese. It depends on the subject.

In UK many public schools changed to IGCSE as GCSE considered too easy by them.

IGCSE Geography and Eng Lit for example are old school. Think 1950s

Phys Chem Bio are far more fact based (eg 1950s) than GCSE Triple and have far greater depth of content. Main complaint about double science in UK is that it has no "real" science in it and a useless prep for A level whereas double IGCSE science is far better prep for A level..

Some subjects are actually very thoughtful - Business Studies and Econs for example.

Ad Maths is very hard - Chinese standard lol

Overall tough quality of the student depends as always on the teaching quality.

I will say though the Singapore O level is far harder than either!

I agree that Singapore tops the list when it comes to maths in particular